Unions and Productivity Again: New Evidence from Matched WERS and Business Census Data*
نویسنده
چکیده
In this preliminary paper we match business Census productivity data from the Annual Business Inquiry (ABI) with WERS data and (i) compare the WERS self-reported productivity data with that of the business survey and (ii) examine the relation between unions and productivity using the business data productivity measures. We find (a) no significant relation between self-reported productivity data and ABI productivity data and (b) a significant positive relation between ABI productivity data and union recognition; a significant positive relation between the K/L ratio and union recognition and negative relation between TFP and unionisation. *Contact: Jonathan Haskel, Queen Mary, University of London, Economics Dept, London E1 4NS, j.e. [email protected]. Financial support for this research comes from the ESRC/EPSRC Advanced Institute of Management Research, grant number RES-331-25-0030 and was carried out at Centre for Research into Business Activity (CeRiBA, www.ceriba.org.uk) at the Business Data Linking Branch at the ONS; we are grateful to all institutions concerned for their support. I particularly thank DTI for making an extract of the WERS data available. This work contains statistical data from ONS which is crown copyright and reproduced with the permission of the controller HMSO and Queen's Printer for Scotland. The use of the ONS statistical data in this work does not imply the endorsement of the ONS in relation to the interpretation or analysis of the statistical data. All errors are of course my own.
منابع مشابه
School of Business and Economics
This paper considers the impact of education and training on both individual and coworker pay and establishment performance using the matched employer-employee data in WERS 2004, the panel dataset 1998-2004 and the new Financial Performance Questionnaire. This enables us to assess the impact of workplace education and training using both subjective (managers’ assessments) and objective data on ...
متن کاملEconomic Impacts of Unionization on Private Sector Employers: 1984-2001
Economic impacts of unionization on employers are difficult to estimate in the absence of large, representative data on establishments with union status information. Estimates are also confounded by selection bias, because unions could organize at highly profitable enterprises that are more likely to grow and pay higher wages. Using multiple establishment-level data sets that represent establis...
متن کاملTrade unions ’ opposition to temporary agency work : Evidence from UK workplace data ∗
Trade unions have an ambiguous relationship with the use of temporary agency work. A firm’s employment of agency workers may be perceived as a replacement of directly employed workers or as way to curb union power, which trade unions would oppose. Alternatively, trade unions may encourage the (temporary) employment of agency workers in a firm, if they manage to bargain higher wages for their me...
متن کاملIZA Discussion Paper Nr. 892
What Do Unions Do for Economic Performance? Twenty years have passed since Freeman and Medoff's What Do Unions Do? This essay assesses their analysis of how unions in the U.S. private sector affect economic performance productivity, profitability, investment, and growth. Freeman and Medoff are clearly correct that union productivity effects vary substantially across workplaces. Their conclusion...
متن کاملUnion Wage Setting and the Distribution of EmployeesEarnings: Evidence from Certication Elections
This paper estimates the causal e¤ect of unionization on the distribution of employee earnings using a regression discontinuity design based on union certi cation elections. The results suggest unions raise the lower end of the distribution by around 25 percent, with a much smaller, even negative e¤ect on the upper tail, and little e¤ect on average earnings. Results on worker retention suggest ...
متن کامل